Month: December 2021

Treating Trauma and Addiction with the Felt Sense Polyvagal Model: A Bottom-Up Approach

A timely and compassionate book on treating trauma and addiction using the Felt Sense Polyvagal Model.

Just at a time when the wider world is waking up to a more compassionate and inclusive way of understanding trauma and addiction, a timely book that addresses these issues in personal, historical, embodied and practical ways has arrived. In Treating Trauma and Addiction with the Felt Sense Polyvagal Model: A Bottom-Up Approach (Routledge, 2021), author and psychotherapist Jan Winhall both demystifies and depathologizes addiction. She does so by demonstrating in theory and with compelling case studies how addictive behaviours are in fact resourceful attempts to regulate a body that has been thrown out of homeostatic balance by traumatic experience.

Winhall’s new book incorporates both focusing and the polyvagal theory to create a treatment model for that is both effective and humane. It’s a model to help those afflicted with addictions and other effects of trauma understand their own physiological and emotional responses, and begin to take steps toward change that are both self-compassionate and doable.

Winhall explains how addiction is a propeller of neurophysiological state change, and in doing so, she solves the mystery of addictive behavior that puzzled her so much as a young therapist. She begins her book with the compelling story of her first women’s group and the mystery of their deeply self-harming behaviors. At the time, she simply couldn’t understand why this fascinating group of young incest survivors would engage in such self-destructive acts. Rejecting the idea that they were simply damaged, broken and ‘borderline’, Winhall went on a decades-long hunt for a more compassionate understanding of how to help these women heal.

A consistent thread through the book is Jan’s story of her own development as a trauma therapist, and it illustrates the evolution of ideas about the etiology and treatment of trauma over the past 40 years. Early influences include Bass and Davis’ The Courage to Heal, and Judith Herman’s classic, Trauma and Recovery. Add to this mix a deep understanding of Eugene Gendlin’s focusing, which brings a way to listen to the body in a way that assumes it knows the way forward. Stir in a healthy grounding in Dan Siegel’s interpersonal neurobiology, Bowlby’s attachment theory, the compassionate views of Gabor Mate, the relational wisdom of Harville Hendrix and Helen LaKelly Hunt, and finally, the updated understanding of the nervous system’s response to threat and connection as proposed in Stephen Porges’ polyvagal theory.

When you combine all of these embodied, compassionate approaches to working with trauma and addiction, what emerges is a model that stands in stark contrast to the medicalized version which pathologizes those who have already suffered so greatly. As Jan so aptly demonstrates, those who have suffered trauma and subsequently engage in a range of addictive behaviours are not broken, but in fact, doing their best to manage their pain and overwhelming emotions in the ways that are most available to them. It reframes their stories from tales of illness to journeys of triumph and liberation.

Winhall’s definition of addiction is a simple and non-judgmental one: “It helps you in the short term, hurts you in the long term, and you can’t stop doing it.” However, the historic view of addictions is not so kind. Winhall leads the reader through a history lesson that shows how the war on drugs, and the controversial evolution of the ‘disease model’ of addiction has led to racist and pathologizing ways of viewing addictive behaviour. It has also prompted many resilient trauma survivors to view their own attempts at self-regulation as shameful and bad, an attitude that hampers their recovery.

The Felt Sense Polyvagal Model

Over her many years of working with those who have suffered from trauma, and with a naturally compassionate and inquiring approach, Winhall has developed a model that makes sense of addictive responses that alleviates blame and shame, and replaces it with ways that clients can make sense of their own shifting states. Through a clear, graphic diagram of the physiological states described by Porges’ polyvagal theory, and guidance on how to map one’s unique pattern of experiences onto this chart, clients can begin the make sense of their own behaviours. They are then offering tools to help them decide how to take systematic and doable steps toward changing those behaviours that are most hurtful in the long term into more healthful ways of managing intense states.

Winhall has included both a detailed model for clinicians and a simplified one for clients in the book as a visual aid for understanding patterns of behaviour that can readily be reframed from addictive to adaptive. In addition, she offers a detailed Embodied Assessment and Treatment Tool (EATT) and a comprehensive list of focusing-oriented strategies that can be tailored to particular clients and their unique challenges. There is also a version for couples, and a lovely case study of how these tools led a couple struggling with the impact of childhood sexual abuse toward deeper connection, understanding and mutual compassion in the face of the painful experience of sex addiction.

Focusing and Thinking at the Edge

Focusing, developed by Eugene Gendlin, is another thread that runs through this book, and is a foundational practice for Winhall. She takes us back to her first meeting with ‘Gene’, as he is affectionately called, and the ways in which his conception of the felt sense brought all of the pieces of the puzzle together for her. She writes, “The felt sense contains the whole of our experiencing, including content and process, thinking and feeling: the sweet spot of integration.”

Winhall’s book not only contains a primer on focusing concepts and their rich underlying philosophy, but also practical examples and many places in the book that invite the reader to pause, check inside, and engage in the material in a focusing-oriented way. In this way, the book is an example of what it describes, a personal journey into the heart of addiction and trauma that invites an embodied response to the material, not just an intellectual one.

In travelling this journey that Winhall takes you on, weaving historical and factual information with personal vignettes, and poignant case studies told with the mastery of a novelist, there is another enduring theme that emerges: one of consilience. What we see, over the course of this immersive journey, is how all of these ideas are related, how they are often different ways of saying the same thing. This makes sense: we are all human beings, sharing the same basic emotions and responses, and Winhall helps us see how we are truly all in this together. Addiction and responses to trauma are not something ‘out there’ that only ill and damaged people engage in. Rather, we are all ‘shaky beings’ (to use Gendlin’s phrase) that are doing our best to self-regulate, to engage in life, and if needed, to liberate ourselves from patterns of behaviour that were brilliant solutions at the time, and may need updating.

The FSPM teaches us all how to identify our autonomic states, to feel into them in the moment and to understand what drives them. It teaches us how to deepen into our own experience and to subsequently guide others into this inner terrain in ways that feel safe and respectful. It moves us from a medical model to one of both self and co-regulation, from framing responses to trauma as acts of triumph and courage rather than freakish acts of self destruction.

This book reads like a story that begins and ends with Winhall’s first women’s group, and her lifelong drive to understand and help these women heal. She offers the example of Bridgette, who was convinced she was a ‘freak’ because of the times she would awaken from a dissociated state to find she had taken a razor to her own vagina. Winhall speaks of how she knew, even before she had fully articulated her model, to ground and connect Bridgette and to ‘validate and celebrate’ her body’s response to trauma, to see it as a way to release the pain and shift away from an unbearable state.

Jan writes, “As I explain this new way of understanding, her face opens. She looks around and see the women in the group riveted by her journey. It is their journey too. Looking incredulous, her jaw drops, and she lights up. Bridgette moves from feeling like a disordered person to a hero who made it through living hell. It is a moment of liberation, a profound shift that changes everything. These moments of liberation, arising out of a system that shames and pathologizes, are the heart of transformational healing. I pause here inside. These are the moments that I live for in the work.”

Posted in

Riding the Waves

A shift in dreaming patterns from the first to second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic

A year and a half ago, as the full scope of the pandemic that was descending on us became apparent, there was a global increase in severe stress, worry, fear and uncertainty. Reports of heightened dream recall and dream vividness were also on the rise, with many experiencing nightmare-like depictions of their greatest pandemic fears realized. This was a time of great upheaval and dysphoria, or, as Harvard professor and dream researcher Dierdre Barrett put it, “an extraordinary time in the history of dreaming.” Global dreaming trends can give us crucial insight not only into our collective mental state, but into how times of crises are reflected in our dream lives.

In Wuhan, a study of 100 nurses working on the front lines found almost half were experiencing nightmares (Tu et al., 2020) and an online survey of 811 individuals reporting dream content found 55% had pandemic-related dream content (Pesonen et al., 2020). As the first wave of the pandemic subsided, dream reports began to decrease. Many reported a “return to baseline” in both dream recall and emotionality (Scarpelli et al., 2021). But we all know this isn’t where the story ends.

Enter the delta variant, causing more infections and spreading more rapidly than its predecessor, plunging many countries into a second wave. So what happened to our collective dream lives during the second wave? Researchers are now sharing their answers.

In the spring of 2020, Scarpelli and colleagues released a web survey to “collect socio-demographic information, psychological and sleep measures, and dream variables” from participants in Italy. Then the second wave hit Italy in October of 2020, giving Scarpelli and colleagues the unique ability to conduct a longitudinal within-subjects study of oneiric activity in different stages of the pandemic.

The researchers released a second survey to the participants of the previous survey, designed to investigate dream changes during the second wave compared to the first wave of the pandemic, and 611 participants responded. They asked about dream recall frequency, nightmare frequency, lucid dream frequency, emotional intensity and nightmare distress. Interestingly, all variables, both quantitative and subjective, were lower in the second wave, yet the emotional tone of the dream content was more negative. Essentially, people are remembering their dreams less, apparently dreaming less, yet the dreams they do have are more negatively toned.

The Scarpelli study was not the only one that who found this. Conte and colleagues (2021) showed that “reported dream emotional tone became significantly more negative both in total lockdown and partial lockdown (second wave) compared to previous periods.” In addition, they found that waking mood was much more negative and fearful during the second wave. Since pandemic dreaming has largely been supporting the ‘continuity hypothesis’ that our dreams reflect waking life concerns, this suggests an over dip in mood and increase in fear which may reflect the fact that by now, most of us believed we would have put COVID-19 behind us. Instead, it seems increasingly unpredictable and lasting, and many people are losing patience and hope.

Each wave in each country hits the residents differently, and everybody rides the waves in their own fashion. Yet, after the devastating effects of the first wave in Italy, it is not difficult to imagine how facing a second wave could elicit negatively toned dreams in Italian residents. A German study by Moradian and colleagues found that during the second wave, participants had more depressive symptoms and exhibited less safety behaviours (such as handwashing and mask wearing), which they believed was evidence of  “pandemic fatigue.” Another study by Kimhi and colleagues found that facing a second wave, participants had reduced resilience. After the shock of the initial wave, it appears that people are facing the second wave with a more resigned and negatively toned attitude, and this is what second-wave dream content reflects – less intensity but increased negativity.

With the dissemination of effective vaccines, it appears the waves of new infection have subsided from tsunami scale to a much more manageable level, especially among vaccinated populations. But vaccine availability and uptake is variable, and the waves continue to roll out in an unpredictable fashion, making this challenging time a kind of ongoing global experiment. The initial shock of the pandemic elicited such a strong shift in our collective dream lives that it spurred the publication of dozens of studies looking into dreams. Hopefully as the degree of disruption subsides, our shared interest in dreams will remain.

Do you know someone who suffers from frequent nightmares?
Or are you a parent concerned about the frequency and intensity of your child’s bad dreams?
Learn why treating nightmares is both essential and surprisingly simple in these two online course about nightmare relief.
Nightmare Treatment Imperative – The complete course for Clinicians
Nightmare Relief for Everyone. A little course designed to help everyone!

References

Kimhi, S.; Eshel, Y.; Marciano, H.; Adini, B. (2020). A Renewed Outbreak of the COVID−19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study of Distress, Resilience, and Subjective Well-Being. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 7743.

Moradian, S., Bäuerle, A., Schweda, A., Musche, V., Kohler, H., Fink, M., Weismüller, B., Benecke, A. V., Dörrie, N., Skoda, E. M., & Teufel, M. (2021). Differences and similarities between the impact of the first and the second COVID-19-lockdown on mental health and safety behaviour in Germany. Journal of public health (Oxford, England), fdab037. Advance online publication.

Pesonen, A.-K., Lipsanen, J., Halonen, R., Elovainio, M., Sandman, N., Mäkelä, J.-M., Antila, M., Béchard, D., Ollila, H. M., & Kuula, L. (2020). Pandemic dreams: Network analysis of dream content during the covid-19 lockdown. Frontiers in Psychology, 11.

Tu, Z. H., He, J. W., & Zhou, N. (2020). Sleep quality and mood symptoms in conscripted frontline nurse in Wuhan, China during COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional study. Medicine99(26), e20769.